1998–2009K90K90Engine not documented for this generationEngine not documentedSee faults & what to checkKickTyres illustration, not a photograph.Mitsubishi Challenger: common faults & what to check
Thinking about buying a used Mitsubishi Challenger (1999–2015) in New Zealand? We've documented 12 known faults for this model spanning cooling, engine, suspension, and fluid leaks. Each researched and verified before it's published. The most serious issues here are rated critical. Every one is listed below with its symptoms and repair cost, and each has its own page with where to look and what to ask the seller. Free, no account needed.
Check this exact Mitsubishi Challenger
- Odometer history
- Money owing
- Reported stolen
- Ownership history
12
Critical
$400–$1,200
7
Which Mitsubishi Challenger are you looking at?
Engine not documented
1998–2009K90K90Engine not documented for this generationEngine not documentedSee faults & what to checkKickTyres illustration, not a photograph.
2015–nowQEQEEngine not documented for this generationEngine not documentedSee faults & what to checkKickTyres illustration, not a photograph.Now narrow it to the engine
Start your free check on this Mitsubishi Challenger
Pick the engine above first: the Challenger came with 2, and without it the report has to show all of their faults. Pick the engine
Can't confirm for this car
Mitsubishi Challenger
Nothing has been narrowed yet, so nothing below is a claim about a particular car. Pick a year and an engine to see which faults apply.
Tell us the engine, or check the engine code on the car, before relying on this.
matched on no vehicle context
What to look out for
Serious issue
Confirm timing belt replacement history with receipts or stamped service book.
6G74 3.5L V6 Timing Belt Failure (Interference Engine)
The 6G74 3.5-litre V6 petrol fitted to K96W Challengers is an interference engine with a rubber timing belt that requires replacement at 90,000 km intervals. Belt failure results in immediate piston-to-valve contact and complete engine destruction. The V6 belt and tensioner setup is expensive to replace but far cheaper than an engine rebuild. A significant proportion of used K96W Challengers on the NZ/AU market have unknown or undocumented belt histories.
What you would notice
Serious issue
Any vertical play in the lower ball joint indicates wear.
Front Lower Control Arm Ball Joint Failure
The front lower control arm ball joints on K96W Challengers are subject to premature wear, particularly on vehicles used off-road or where the ball joint boots have been damaged by stone strike or water ingress. A failed ball joint causes unpredictable steering and is a WOF failure item. Widely documented across Mitsubishi's K9x-series platform including Pajero Sport.
What you would notice
Costly issue
With engine warm, inspect the injection pump body carefully with a torch for any wet oil or fuel film.
4M40 2.8D Injection Pump External Seal Failure
The Bosch-type injection pump fitted to the 4M40 2.8-litre diesel in K96W Challengers develops external seal and o-ring failures with age, allowing diesel fuel and pump lubricant to leak from the pump body and mounting area. This is a widely documented fault on 4M40-powered vehicles (also shared with Pajero) and is progressive — a minor seep can become a significant leak if ignored. Fuel contact with hot exhaust components is a fire risk.
What you would notice
Costly issue
Ask the seller for the service history and look for a dealer invoice or service stamp showing recall PRA 2016/15466 was done.
Headlight and indicator switch can fail recall (PB and PC Challenger, 2010-2014)
PB and PC Challengers were recalled in June 2016 (PRA 2016/15466) because the turn signal and lighting switch connectors can wear and collect oxidised dust, so the lights and indicators can fail. The VIN ranges cover nearly every PB and PC built. It applies to all engines. The fix was free at a Mitsubishi dealer.
What you would notice
See all 12 documented issues
Depends on which engine this Mitsubishi Challenger has — 12
Engine, transmission & cooling
014D56 coolant loss and overheating - service campaign 020116 and replaced engines
Can't confirm for this car024D56 timing belt and balance shaft belt — a snapped belt destroys the engine
Can't confirm for this car03Coolant loss, overheating and head gasket blow-by, service campaign 020116 (2.5 4D56 diesel, built before March 2014)
Can't confirm for this car
Can't confirm for this car
Mitsubishi machined the top face of the 4D56 cylinder block too roughly on engines built before 18 March 2014, so the head gasket never sealed properly against it and combustion pressure could push past into the coolant. In November 2014 Mitsubishi opened preventative service campaign 020116 for PB/PC Challengers with the 2.5-litre 4D56HP diesel, citing engines overheating from 'repetitive coolant evaporation' after high-load driving such as towing, and inadequate head gasket sealing at the upper block surface. Australian owner forums carry accounts of head gaskets failing on low-kilometre cars, including a 2014 build at 60,000 km with tracking marks visible between cylinders. The pattern is coolant that vanishes with nothing on the ground, then an overheat, then a bill that can run into a head skim or a new engine. Mitsubishi changed the machining process around 2014, so later cars are the safer buy.
Example of the part — not this vehicleA used multi-layer head gasket. Discolouration between a cylinder and a water gallery is the tell.
Symptoms to notice
What to check
Ask the seller
044D56 balance shaft belt shredding and taking the timing belt with it
Can't confirm for this car056G74 3.5L V6 Timing Belt Failure (Interference Engine)
Can't confirm for this car
Can't confirm for this car
Unconfirmed. This entry does not match our record of which engines and years this model was sold with, and is awaiting review. Confirm it against the car before acting on it.
The 6G74 3.5-litre V6 petrol fitted to K96W Challengers is an interference engine with a rubber timing belt that requires replacement at 90,000 km intervals. Belt failure results in immediate piston-to-valve contact and complete engine destruction. The V6 belt and tensioner setup is expensive to replace but far cheaper than an engine rebuild. A significant proportion of used K96W Challengers on the NZ/AU market have unknown or undocumented belt histories.
Symptoms to notice
What to check
Ask the seller
06Suction control valve on the Denso high-pressure pump — hard hot starting and surging
Can't confirm for this carElectrical
01Headlight and indicator switch can fail recall (PB and PC Challenger, 2010-2014)
Can't confirm for this car
Can't confirm for this car
PB and PC Challengers were recalled in June 2016 (PRA 2016/15466) because the turn signal and lighting switch connectors can wear and collect oxidised dust, so the lights and indicators can fail. The VIN ranges cover nearly every PB and PC built. It applies to all engines. The fix was free at a Mitsubishi dealer.
Symptoms to notice
What to check
Ask the seller
Body, brakes, suspension & interior
01Front Lower Control Arm Ball Joint Failure
Can't confirm for this car
Can't confirm for this car
The front lower control arm ball joints on K96W Challengers are subject to premature wear, particularly on vehicles used off-road or where the ball joint boots have been damaged by stone strike or water ingress. A failed ball joint causes unpredictable steering and is a WOF failure item. Widely documented across Mitsubishi's K9x-series platform including Pajero Sport.
Example of the part — not this vehicleA separated lower ball joint: the control arm has dropped and the wheel has splayed out under the guard.
Symptoms to notice
What to check
Ask the seller
02Front lower control arm weld failure - 2013 safety recall (PRA 2013/13840)
Can't confirm for this car
Can't confirm for this car
In November 2013 Mitsubishi recalled 20,405 Australian vehicles - 17,540 Tritons and 2,865 Challengers - from the 2011 and 2012 model years built before 11 May 2012. The front suspension lower control arms had been improperly welded, and the recall notice warned that the weld could fail, at which point the vehicle would become unstable and pull sharply to one side of the road. The Challenger campaign is PRA 2013/13840. The repair is free at a Mitsubishi dealer, but a vehicle this old has usually changed hands several times and a good number were never presented, so on a 2011 or 2012 Challenger this has to be confirmed against the VIN rather than assumed. It costs nothing to check and it is the single highest-value phone call you can make about this car.
Symptoms to notice
What to check
Ask the seller
03Power seat recline switch can jam on — seat motor and cushion can melt or burn (2013 recall)
Can't confirm for this car
Can't confirm for this car
In September 2013 Mitsubishi recalled Challenger 4WD XLS models built from 2010 to 2012 with powered front seats. The recline switch can stick in the operated position instead of springing back, so current keeps flowing to the seat motor after you let go. With nothing to stop it, the motor, the seat cushion and the trim around it can get hot enough to melt and, in the worst case, catch fire. The same defect covered Triton 4x4 double cabs of a similar era. It is a free fix, but a fourteen-year-old four-wheel-drive that has been through several owners and possibly a few trade sales is exactly the sort of vehicle that never went back for it.
Symptoms to notice
What to check
Ask the seller
04Tailgate gas springs can corrode and break, tailgate drops suddenly, safety recall PRA 2016/15767 (PB/PC Challenger)
Can't confirm for this car
Can't confirm for this car
On 12-13MY PB and 14MY PC Challengers, Mitsubishi found the end caps on the tailgate gas springs were not given enough anti-corrosion coating. The end cap can rust and break, letting the tailgate fall suddenly onto whoever is standing under it. Mitsubishi recalled 5,924 Australian Challengers in December 2016 (PRA 2016/15767) and replaces both springs free of charge. The replacement springs are silver, so the original black ones are easy to spot.
Symptoms to notice
What to check
Ask the seller
Mitsubishi Challenger faults in detail
What these repairs cost on other cars
Some of the Mitsubishi Challenger’s documented faults are repairs other models share. Each page lists the documented NZ cost for every model it affects.
Other Mitsubishi models
Mitsubishi Challenger buyer questions
Is the Mitsubishi Challenger reliable?
Like any used car, it depends on the specific example and its service history. Across the 12 documented faults for the Mitsubishi Challenger, the recurring problem areas are cooling, engine, and suspension. A Mitsubishi Challenger with a full service history and no signs of the issues listed on this page can be a sound buy but each one needs to be checked individually before you commit.
What are the most common problems with a used Mitsubishi Challenger?
We've catalogued 12 known faults for the Mitsubishi Challenger, covering cooling, engine, and suspension. All 12 are written out in full on this page, with the symptoms to notice, what to inspect, and typical repair costs for each. Free to read, no account needed.
How much do repairs cost on a Mitsubishi Challenger?
Most single repairs on the Mitsubishi Challenger fall between $400–$1,200 at NZ independent-workshop rates. Some of the 12 documented faults cost less and a few cost considerably more, and no one car needs them all. Knowing which ones to look for before you view is what lets you negotiate the price down or walk away.
Should I get a pre-purchase inspection on a Mitsubishi Challenger?
Yes. A Mitsubishi Challenger inspection focused on its known weak points is the single best way to avoid an expensive mistake. KickTyres gives you a guided, model-specific inspection plus a market valuation and negotiation figure for $24.90 far less than the cost of missing one of the faults on this page.